Built for manufacturers and dealers of pumpers, aerial ladders, tankers, rescue trucks, and ambulances selling to cities, counties, and fire protection districts. The system monitors SAM.gov, the NYC City Record, and CanadaBuys, reads every new solicitation with AI, scores it 0 to 100 against your product lines and build slots, extracts the deadline, quantity, specs, and bond requirements, and delivers the qualified opportunities in one daily digest.
Fire apparatus solicitations are scattered across SAM.gov, state purchasing sites, city e-procurement systems, and Canadian portals. Each one has its own search, its own categories, and its own posting rhythm. Sales teams check the big ones weekly, the rest never, and find out about the perfect-fit pumper bid from the award announcement.
This is what the bid team sees. Press Run today's scan to pull this morning's postings across all three portals, then open the scoring and digest tabs to see how each solicitation is evaluated and delivered.
| Solicitation | Buyer | Qty | Bid Due | Fit Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Press "Run today's scan" to pull this morning's postings from SAM.gov, NYC City Record, and CanadaBuys. | ||||
Good morning. 41 new postings reviewed across SAM.gov, NYC City Record, and CanadaBuys. 3 qualified against the profile:
38 postings screened out (full log attached with reasons: 11 outside product lines, 14 below contract minimum, 9 services/parts only, 4 delivery timeline conflicts). Reply PURSUE 1 to open a bid folder.
No new software for the bid team to learn. The system runs in the background and delivers to email.
| Category | Detail |
|---|---|
| Manual Process Replaced | Sales coordinators manually checking a bookmark list of bid portals on inconsistent schedules, running keyword searches that miss solicitations titled in procurement vocabulary, and reading 40 page solicitation documents to find the quantity, deadline, and bond requirement |
| Trigger | Scheduled daily run each business morning pulling every posting added to the monitored portals since the previous run, with the digest delivered at 6:00 AM local time |
| What the System Does | Pulls new postings from each portal's official data source; normalizes the three feed formats; runs each solicitation through an AI pass that reads the full text, identifies the apparatus type regardless of how the title is worded, and extracts quantity, specification references, bid deadline, bond requirements, delivery timeline, and set aside status; scores fit 0 to 100 against the manufacturer profile with written reasoning; and delivers qualified postings in a ranked digest with the complete review log attached |
| Demo Data Sources | SAM.gov Get Opportunities API (free API key, federal solicitations including USDA Forest Service and Department of Defense apparatus purchases), NYC Open Data City Record Online procurement notices via the Socrata SODA API (the largest municipal buyer in the United States), and CanadaBuys open tender notice files (Government of Canada, refreshed each morning) |
| Scoring Factors | Product line match between the solicited apparatus and the manufacturer's catalog, open build slots against the required delivery timeline, estimated contract value against the manufacturer's minimum, and compliance requirements (NFPA specification references, Buy America, bonding capacity) against the manufacturer's certifications |
| Who Uses It | Sales and bid teams at fire apparatus OEMs, regional apparatus dealers, ambulance manufacturers and remounters, and any manufacturer selling vehicles or equipment to government buyers through competitive solicitation |
| Integrations | Portal data sources (workflow input), n8n (feed normalization and orchestration), AI model (solicitation reading, extraction, and scoring), Google Sheets (complete review log and audit trail), email delivery (daily digest), deadline reminders as bid due dates approach |
| Output | Daily 6 AM email digest with qualified solicitations ranked by fit score, each showing buyer, quantity, estimated value, bid deadline, bond requirement, delivery terms, and the AI's written pursuit reasoning, plus a full log of screened out postings with the reason each was excluded |
| Portability | The portal list is configured per client. State purchasing systems, city e-procurement platforms, cooperative purchasing networks, and international tender systems are added the same way; the manufacturer profile and scoring weights are the constant |
Bid intelligence is automated monitoring of government procurement portals for solicitations a manufacturer can actually win. Instead of a sales coordinator checking portals manually, the system pulls every new posting daily from official data sources, uses AI to read each solicitation's full text, scores it against the manufacturer's product lines, build slots, territories, and contract minimums, and delivers the qualified opportunities in a ranked digest. For fire apparatus manufacturers this means every pumper, aerial, tanker, rescue, wildland engine, and ambulance solicitation across the monitored portals is reviewed every day, with nothing missed because of a quirky title or an unchecked portal.
This demonstration uses three official, machine readable sources: SAM.gov (the U.S. federal contract opportunities system, accessed through GSA's free Get Opportunities API, where buyers like the USDA Forest Service and Department of Defense post apparatus solicitations), NYC Open Data's City Record procurement notices (the largest municipal buyer in the United States, accessed through the Socrata SODA API), and CanadaBuys (the Government of Canada tender portal, which publishes its tender notices as structured data files refreshed each morning). Production deployments add the portals relevant to each client: state purchasing systems, city and county e-procurement platforms, and cooperative purchasing networks.
Each solicitation is scored 0 to 100 on four weighted factors: product line match (does the solicited apparatus type match something the manufacturer builds, judged from the specification text rather than the posting title), build slot fit (does the required delivery timeline align with open production capacity), contract size (does the estimated value clear the manufacturer's minimum), and compliance fit (can the manufacturer meet the referenced NFPA specifications, Buy America requirements, and bonding obligations). The score arrives with written reasoning, so the bid team sees not just a number but the specific facts behind it and any flags for the apparatus committee.
From each posting the AI extracts the buyer and solicitation number, apparatus type and quantity, bid due date and time, bid bond or bid security requirement, required delivery timeline, specification references (such as NFPA standards or agency equipment provisions), set aside status, pre-bid conference details, and cooperative purchasing clauses. These extracted fields are what appear in the digest and what drive the deadline reminders as due dates approach.
This is the core failure of keyword based saved searches and the main reason the AI reads the full solicitation text. A federal posting titled "vehicle, firefighting, 1500 GPM" is a Type 1 pumper solicitation that a keyword alert for "pumper" never catches. The AI identifies the apparatus type from the specification content: pump capacity, tank size, chassis requirements, and NFPA chapter references, so the classification does not depend on how the purchasing officer happened to word the title.
Every reviewed posting is logged with its score and the specific reason it was excluded: outside the product lines, below the contract minimum, a parts or service only solicitation, or a delivery timeline that conflicts with build capacity. The log rides along with the daily digest as an attachment and accumulates in a spreadsheet as the audit trail, so the team can verify nothing was missed and adjust the profile if the screening is too tight or too loose.
Yes. The architecture is portal agnostic and product agnostic: the portal list, the manufacturer profile, and the scoring weights are configuration, not new engineering. The same engine monitors state education procurement for modular classroom builders, municipal utility and EPA funded project portals for water treatment equipment makers, DOT and city portals for street lighting manufacturers, and VA and state health RFPs for medical equipment suppliers. Any manufacturer that bids on government contracts, in any country, against any portal that publishes its solicitations.
Each business morning the n8n workflow queries the SAM.gov Get Opportunities API, the NYC City Record procurement dataset, and the CanadaBuys tender notice files, collecting every posting added since the previous run.
The three sources arrive in different structures. The workflow maps each into a single record format: buyer, title, full text or document link, posting date, response deadline, and source identifiers.
The AI pass reads the specification content, not just the title, identifying apparatus type from pump capacity, tank size, chassis requirements, and NFPA references, and extracting quantity, deadline, bond, delivery terms, and set aside status.
Product line match, build slot fit against the required delivery timeline, contract value against the minimum, and compliance requirements against certifications, weighted into one score with written reasoning.
Qualified or screened out, each posting is appended to the Google Sheets review log with its score and reason, building the audit trail that proves nothing was missed.
Qualified solicitations arrive by email ranked by fit score with the extracted facts and reasoning. As each bid due date approaches, reminder notices fire automatically to the bid team.